The dubious rubber-fetishism of 'the Bat' has never been for me, I've always been a blue tights kind of guy...
Superman
is 75 this year, so it’s almost impossible to imagine a time when he
wasn’t leaping tall buildings in a single bound. The ‘Man of Tomorrow’ has had his highs and
lows throughout the decades, but it’s good to be able to write about this
particular pop culture icon now, at a time when he seems to be flying higher
than ever.
I've
already written about the extreme relief which Man of Steel's success
has been this year, and I can never suppress a wry smile when I see the current
preponderance of the 'S' symbol on street wear when I'm out and about in our
own Metropolis. It's as if the old
fashioned values of Superman, which had seemed to disappear under a bat-shaped
shadow of cynicism and vengeance some time ago, (or was it actually a huge ‘M’
for Marvel?), have finally emerged back into the sun. Perhaps newer generations are less inclined
to shuffle uncomfortably when faced with words like truth and justice;
righteous outrage and intolerance of societal ills are apparently Y-Generation
traits and we should all be grateful for that.
However,
the direction Man of Steel's marketing took seemed initially at odds to
this proud new attitude. Not only did we
seem to have a film without the character’s name in the title and a shy teaser
poster which barely even shows the ‘S’ symbol, but a trailer which cut Amy
Adams off before she can even say “Superm…”
As we now know however, this apparent coyness turned out to be nothing
of the kind, and all for good reason.
But I'm
getting ahead of myself. I'd call myself
a fan of the character, but at the same time feel somewhat fraudulent in doing
so in doing so because Superman is a creation of the DC comics world, and I
never read them. With a scant few
exceptions, my experience of Superman is almost exclusively through what are
strictly called adaptations - in film and television.
George
Reeve was Superman when I was growing up in the mid-seventies, even if Adventures
of Superman actually first screened in 1952. It wasn't unusual to have
shows of this vintage screened in prime viewing slots back then, and the fact
that it was one of the very first series ever to be filmed in colour probably
helped (not that any of us had colour TVs yet). We didn't know or care that it
was horribly dated even then. The
rushing wind sound as Superman took to the air (in the same special effects
shot every time, which looked as if it had been matted with a black felt pen)
and the unforgettable introduction (“...is it a bird, is it a plane..”) were
the most exciting thing our 15 inch black and white screen ever lost its
vertical hold on.
In years
to come, a little film by George Lucas absolutely hypnotised and entranced me
to the exclusion of almost all else. So when
I heard that a Superman film was coming out the following year, which according
to the inevitable hype was going to be 'better than Star Wars' , I vowed
to hate it there and then. I probably wouldn’t even have gone to see it, except
my family, (once again, I recall it was Mum who was especially keen) dragged me
along while we were away on holiday.
I’d love
to report that I loved Superman the Movie on sight, but I stupidly
wouldn’t let myself. I knew it was good, I could see that Christopher Reeve was
the Man, but instead I picked and niggled at this magical film like the brat I
was.
But two
years later, we all went to see Superman II and that experience
transformed me into a life-long fan in the space of 127 minutes. Yes, it’s a
fabulous film (although even I came to realise not as fabulous as the first)
but it was more what happened at this particular screening. During the climactic battle in, under and
above Metropolis, the whole cinema audience went crazy for Superman. Perhaps it
was a little ironically intended, or maybe this spontaneous release of
enthusiasm could have happened at another film - but that night everyone
clapped and cheered and yelled for all they were worth.
I’d never
experienced an audience responding to a film like that before and I doubt I
ever will again - walking out of that cinema, with John
William’s beloved score still blaring from the speakers, I felt like I wanted
to fly. “We used to cheer the cowboys at
the pictures” said my Dad afterwards, “Now they’re cheering Superman!”
By the
time Superman III arrived, friends and I took our girlfriends – the days
of tagging along with our families were past. It was fun, but if we felt like
being analytical we could see that it was very far from a good film. And when Superman IV limped into
cinemas four years later I couldn’t even find anyone prepared to see it with
me, and only caught it myself many years later on VHS (not the best use I ever
put my membership card to).
These
were the dark years, but while everyone flocked to see Batman at the cinema, I
rediscovered Superman the Movie through VHS, and with the maturing of
what passed for my critical faculties I could finally appreciate it for the
modern masterpiece it was. Of course it
has its faults, but the tone is absolutely right. The world believed a man could fly back in
1978 because everyone involved in this film believed it too, particularly
Director Richard Donner and his Star.
Even Brando, overweight, overpaid and unrehearsed, turns in a
performance of almost preposterous gravitas and dignity.
I never
really invested in Lois and Clark: the New Adventures of Superman on TV,
as it always struck me as little more than a thinly-caped vehicle for Teri
Hatcher’s debatable talents. It
certainly had its fans though. When
Christopher Reeve’s tragic 1995 accident was reported and someone at work
gasped that Superman had broken his neck, another very young colleague cried:
“Oh no, poor Dean Cain!” Similarly, Smallville never caught on with me –
ten years of foreplay – really?
What did
excite me was the news that the ‘Godfather of the modern superhero film’ and
massive Superman fan, Bryan Singer was bringing ‘Big Blue’ back to the
screen. Everything about it sounded
perfect – John William’s music:
tick, a sequel which follows on from the second Reeve film and over-writes the
last two: GREAT idea, a digital Brando cameo: could it get any better?
It might
be surprising to contemplate that, takings–wise, Superman Returns was a
huge success and there was much talk of a sequel. However, what we saw on screen was proof that
you can be too much in love with something, as Singer clearly was with the 1978
film. His ‘sequel’ actually comes across as an infatuated remake (coining the
expression ‘re-quel’), as he lovingly re-crafts key scenes and even lines of
dialogue from Donner’s film. The title
sequence, a 21st century reworking of the original opening, is great, and when
the rare action is delivered, it hits the spot.
However, with his annoyingly undersized ‘S’, Brandon Routh comes across
as more of a ‘Superboy’ and this rather ‘emo’ film has been labelled the
world’s first ‘Superhero weepie’.
A limited
market, to be sure…
Seven
years later, Man of Steel took the exact opposite approach to Singer,
treating the subject as if it had never been filmed before. So there are no 'kisses to the past' in terms
of previous films, but I'm assured that there are plenty to the mythology of
the comics. And with that, I'll move on as I've probably written quite enough
about this year's film in these last two posts.
I think
I’m a Superman fan for two reasons, apart from three very good films. Like Kal-El, I’m adopted and although my own
special powers seem limited to emulating the creature this blog is named after,
the concept of being raised by parents who didn’t bring you into this world but
love you all the more for it strikes a chord with me. Trying to adapt to a strange new environment
at a very young age, as I did when we immigrated, also has resonance.
And secondly, despite my unspectacular personal record, I think it’s important to constantly strive to be better than we are. To hold yourself back from simply responding in kind to unthinking aggression and prejudice, to help others whenever you can and never give in if you believe your cause is a just one. Man of Tomorrow is an apt name for this ‘strange visitor from another planet’ because I also believe that if we strive to live up the same ideals, we can all be super men one day.
The above images of George Reeves, Christopher Reeve and Henry Cavill are taken from Zack Snyder'sAnd secondly, despite my unspectacular personal record, I think it’s important to constantly strive to be better than we are. To hold yourself back from simply responding in kind to unthinking aggression and prejudice, to help others whenever you can and never give in if you believe your cause is a just one. Man of Tomorrow is an apt name for this ‘strange visitor from another planet’ because I also believe that if we strive to live up the same ideals, we can all be super men one day.
wonderful 75th anniversary animated short - enjoy it here:
And here is my own 75th anniversary tribute (magnify to read):
No comments:
Post a Comment